BITPERFECT VS AUDIRVANA MAC

BITPERFECT VS AUDIRVANA MAC

Playlist interfaces are lightning fast, technically detailed as you'd like with a native Mac look.

In contrast, Swinsian offers splendid, Mac-native playlist functionality. Outside of cost, I didn't like the playlist functionality (auto-updates to my folders didn't work, filtering a library is an way to interact with music).

Audirvana is also only two activations (hate this, I have three Macs I use often and another two I use occasionally). 5 version update! Audirvana is on v3.5 which makes about €310 laid out for buyers who started with v1. Personally, I decided that I didn't like the price and the constant paid updates (competitors do not do this Swinsian was a single €21 purchase, Calibra a single €8 purchase, Decibel a single $33 purchase, Fidelia a single $39 purchase. But whatever the Audirvana is (and likes the special sauce in this case, albeit he usually wants bit perfect), it's not bit perfect.īTW, I'm not an Audirvana owner or a fan, just own most of the competitors and have trialed intensively several versions of Audirvana. There's also a tiny boost in a key treble range (my guess is around 8kHz or 10kHz), giving 'more detail' or resolution to the Audirvana sound. What's special about the Audirvana sound is slightly greater stereo separation, creating a 'wider' soundstage and more air/atmosphere. Audirvana sounds different, arguably 'better'. They are all bit perfect in standard configuration and hence identical. I haven't tested Bitperfect only because I never use iTunes but from reports it falls into the same group. Swinsian, Calibri, Decibel, Fidelia all sound identical on music which they can play back at native resolution (Decibel doesn't handle all bitrates of DSD). In my opinion, he's been quite successful. Damien has chosen to offer 'better' sound. To be able to differentiate from other players, Audirvana has to either add features which others don't have or Audirvana has to be cheaper or Audirvana has to offer 'better' sound.

Audirvana has been on the market for years. It's not that Plisson cannot provide bitperfect output – he can. Since my iTunes is stored on a NAS I make sure to disable BitPerfect when it is not in use so I can do other functions on the NAS.Click to claims (in fact, Damien Plisson's own claim) about Audirvana sweetening the sound is absolutely accurate. I tried a much more expensive player several years ago and must say that BitPerfect hits a homer! I am using it in Integer mode and understand that the application is a” hog' but it is worth the trade-off. The changes through my electrostatic speakers was way more than I expected - much improved soundstage in depth, transient response, and musicality. Wow I thought music produced by my system sounded good but once I added the BitPerfect application, I was in audio nirvana. I became aware of BitPerfect while reading a column in Paul McGovern’s (owner of PS Audio) blog. It was nice to say that the change she heard was coming from an under $10 purchase. What a huge leap in iTunes sound quality! When my wife came into the sound room she was asking if I had purchased a new component. Icon design by Doug Stewart ().īitPerfect - An Audiophile’s iTunes Savior Support for AirPlay (requires OS X 10.8 and above).

Integer Mode playback - on supported DACs and supported versions of OS X (requires OS X 10.9 and above). Plays native DSD files in 'Hybrid-DSD' format with DSD-compatible DACs įull memory playback with triple-buffering to ensure continuous playback of large files.Ĭhoice of sample rate converters for up- and down-sampling.ĭithered bit depth reduction and volume control. Localization included in Japanese, French, Dutch, Danish, and Russian only BitPerfect is a simple, easy to use, audiophile grade music player that works in conjunction with iTunes to deliver the highest possible sound quality.

Bitperfect vs audirvana